One branch of the popular IHOP pancake restaurant has recently gone controversial after one mother complained about the way her disabled son was treated while they were at the store.
Apparently, William Bancroft, who was only 3 years of age, didn’t have arms and the restaurant’s general manager had and issue with that.
3-year-old William Bancroft is doing his best to live a normal life, despite having no arms.
According to Alexis, the mother of William, the young boy usually sits on the table and uses his feet to eat and drink. Unfortunately, restaurant manager approached them and said the child can not sit on the table for “health department issues”.
As if that was not enough, the manager also pointed out that William is not allowed to touch the syrup dispensers using his feet for sanitary reasons.
Alexis, William’s mom, defended she washed the boy’s feet in the bathroom before they began eating.
In an interview, Alexis explained:
“I asked her what’s the difference between hands and feet?
“I asked, ‘Do you ask all your customers if they’ve washed their hands before they touch the syrup dispensers fist?’”
Although the manager later returned to apologize about what she did, Alexis and her family “chose to leave for the way my child was treated”.
The mother from Arkansas later said:
“Everybody was staring at us and everything. They were going to give us our food, but we decided to leave because of the way he was treated. He was discriminated against for not having arms.”
Other customers were also disappointed with how the young boy was treated. Alexis further went on:
“We go to multiple restaurants around our area, and no one has ever said anything about him. Most people are just amazed that he can even feed himself with his feet…
“Some people say it’s unsanitary for a kid to be seated on the table, but that’s how stuff happens in our household. My son sits on the table every single meal throughout the day.”
Both the manager and the IHOP company later got in touch with Alexis after she posted about the incident on Facebook.
The manager apologized the second time by sending a private message via social media. Employees likewise contacted the mother, expressing they were “completely shocked” and “deeply ashamed” about their manager’s behavior.
Meanwhile, IHOP released a statement to address the issue, saying the company does not “tolerate actions that are or allude to discrimination of any type,” promising they will “retrain” their staff “to ensure IHOP’s level of service, particularly regarding guests with disabilities, is provided to all”.
Poor Man Who’s Rejected Repeatedly For Trying To Buy Lamborghini Stuns Agent With His Ride
They were left stunned when he actually bought a supercar.
No matter how much you believe that appearances are not everything, you can't deny that in some industries, your look matters a lot. Take for instance car dealerships -- more often than not, they'll always be on a lookout for customers who drop by only to take a free spin of supercars or even waste their time by chatting only to take selfies with the luxury vehicles.
The thing is a lot of rich guys who can actually afford don't really look the part. Maxman TV managed to show proof through a social experiment that there are car dealers who would easily turn away potential customers just by judging them by appearance.
The potential customer came to the car dealership with his average-looking sedan.
Is It Right or Wrong for Parents to Pay Kids for Doing Chores?
Experts still can’t seem to agree if it’s beneficial to kids when parents promise to pay them if they do household chores.
Parents always want what's best for their kids. That includes teaching them some life skills and instilling the right values. Parents also don't want their kids to be lazy. They want them to be independent.
Indeed, moms and dads do a number of things to encourage their children's independence. It so happens that one of the best ways to do this is to give kids certain responsibilities. Of course, the first thing that comes to mind is to give them chores.
Should they be paid for dealing with their own mess?
Judge Orders 30-Year-Old Man To Vacate Parents’ House After They Complained Against Him
He does not help in household chores nor support financially.
A 30-year old man has been ordered by a judge to vacate his parents’ house after his parents brought matters to the court as their last recourse to have him evicted from home. After several attempts to have him move out failed, it was time for the court to meddle, his parents thought.
While it is the responsibility of the parents to provide for the needs of their children, some cultures dictate that they should only do so for them until a certain age. When children come of the right age and are considered adults, they are already expected to fend for themselves.